I don’t become as surprised as I used to, but still find these comparisons interesting. The difference isn’t very big.
iPhones are great for filming in places with natural or studio lighting! It is in low lighting environments where the difference in quality is most pronounced.
All the best, Leia
Host of Gluten-Free Living | News | English Language 
#1: Yes, it's a way to describe what it’s compared against without using the actual camera name and model, which most people wouldn’t know what it is anyway. In this case they compare it to a camera used for cinema films. The Canon EOS C200 Cinema Camera cost about 7,500 USD without a lens, so it's in a completely different price range than a phone.
#3 Oh boy that is expensive. I do understand now, I wouldn't have had a clue otherwise.
To participate in the discussion, you must first become a member. It is quick, simple and free. The membership gives you access to all our communities.
LONDON - NEW YORK - PARIS - MILANO - TOKYO - HONG KONG - THE REST OF THE WORLD
© Copyright Savvity AB
